An unexpected problem of this bass build was the complete lack of any useful edges or datum lines. Before any holes are drilled or cutouts are made, the tube needs to be marked out. This can't be done freehand, or with a ruler so I had to think outside the, um, tube. Fortunately a bit of spreadsheet magic enabled me to plot some graphs that I could wrap around the tube and use as cutting guides. Once in place it was time to fire up the angle grinder - not a tool I normally use when making guitars!
Making holes in stainless with ordinary HSS drills is often less than successful, cobalt ones seem to fare much better.
Fretwire?
Bashing fret wire into wood is quite satisfying. Bashing them into perspex as I have done on the last two builds is not great - it doesn't have the same give and one bash too hard could end up cracking the whole fboard. For the perspex fboards I had to make wider slots then rely on glue doing the rest. There has been one or two dislodged moments over the years, but on the whole they have lasted well. Cutting accurate slots on the stainless tube could have been an option, but I think it would look 'bitty'. Besides I had another daft idea that could only work on a tube...
Curly Wurly
Wouldn't it be great to use a specially wound spring fitted snugly on the tube to act as frets. It would start off with a wide coil spacing and reduces each turn. Between frets 12 and 13, the coil distance would be half that between coil 0 (the nut?) and 1. I drafted out a spec, supplied the equations and sent it off to a couple of spring companies for a quote.
The coil winding fboard approach had a couple of side effects:
Dingwall guitars make basses with fan frets. I've never played one, but apparently they combine good tone with playability. As long as the frets under each string are accurate to a single scale length, it doesn't matter that an adjacent string has a different scale length. Using a coil spring for the frets should be exactly the same. To capitalise on the thicker-strings-needing-a-longer-scale concept, so I'll need to ensure the spring is wound in the right direction!
2. the frets will also be on the back of the neck
Mmm, I suppose they will, but I'm going to do it anyway
Meanwhile, the spring company replies came back. One wanted £250 + VAT just to develop a spring with no guarantees of success, the other just wished me good luck...
The sensible option here would be to make the design more conventional, cut nice perpendicular slots and glue individual pre-radiused frets in. So I decided to make a purpose built spring winder instead*. Boing said Zebedee!
*To be honest I did try winding a spring manually first just to see how difficult it was. Stainless steel likes to fight back so this prompted the spring winder to be pretty chunky. As can be seen from the pic, manually winding a spring results in a very irregular string spacing which is no use at all.
Useful info gleaned from this exercise was the diameter of the former on which the spring is wound. Empirical equations exist, but this application is a way outside the normal wire-diameter-to-spring-diameter ratio. Two or three trial attempts showed that with a former of 30mm, a finished spring ID of approx 49mm was produced which was ideal.
No comments:
Post a Comment